Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. I was going to keep it, but the external link no longer works. Looks like the site is gone. howcheng {chat} 18:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Binary Report

Non-notable "news" site with no Alexa ranking, few relevant Google hits - and it's hosted on Freewebs. FCYTravis 07:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Agnte 14:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Wow, 120 visitors per day? :) r3m0t ^talk 21:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, based on reading the first paragraph until its very end. Getting mainstream media attention (which google seems to verify and it's mentioned in the Katelyn Faber article here too) qualifies it per WP:WEB. - Bobet 02:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.