Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billingham Bags

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Billingham Bags

Billingham Bags (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Advertisement, not notable. Prod contested on two separate occasions in the past. Sable232 02:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - does not provide any indication of notability; reads like fan-site. ZBrannigan 03:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Self-promotion, no assertion of notability. DoorsAjar 08:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - not enough information to establish notability. BTLizard 10:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Articles here [1] [2] [3] from established magazines (these appear to be transcriptions from articles, so they are not just from one source). A major manufacturer of camera bags sold by many major photographic stores (B&H photo and Jessops off the top of my head). The article is poor at the moment but could easily be saved with a bit of work. Will attempt a cleanup soon --Xarr 19:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - it is a self-advertisement. — Wenli 22:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.