Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill thundercliff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 07:02Z

[edit] Bill thundercliff

Bill thundercliff (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Bill Thundercliff (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Hoax. Zero googles, and I can find no evidence that the referenced books exist. The cameos with Lenin and in The Jazz Singer don't help, either. —Cryptic 06:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Addendum: Duplicated at Bill Thundercliff. --Calton | Talk 16:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as a hoax. Heimstern Läufer 06:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. MER-C 08:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 08:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. One of his bookrefs is "Diaries of a Child at Sea, ISBN 0 571 08989 5": this ISBN number is actually Old English Houses, Author: Hugh Braun, Publisher: Faber and Faber, Publication Date 1969-04, ASIN / ISBN: 0571089895, Taschenbuch, 168 Pages. HOAX. Anthony Appleyard 10:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete His death was as dramatic as the rest of his life, he was struck by lightning whilst sailing off Cancun He may be notable as the first tourist in Cancun, Cancun wasn't developed for tourism until the mid 70's. ;-) In 1950 Cancun was home to three caretakers of a coconut plantation, probably even less was there in 1932. Tubezone 13:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete hoaxy nonsense, the sooner the better. Also, clean-up the insertions of this nonsense into other articles. --Calton | Talk 16:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 22:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Definitely a hoax (and a pretty silly one, to boot—it reads like Uncyclopedia material). --Makaristos 01:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.