Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Henley (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bill Henley

Bill Henley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Minor local meteorologist, no references, no assertion of notability. Biruitorul 22:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete per the above reckoning, and ALSO should be deleted for the exact same reasons it was deleted before. Nothing has changed about this article since the last time it was deleted. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Local weathermen not generally considered notable. --Groggy Dice T | C 12:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Article is orphan, unreferenced. Some information written, like "the Miami Beach" is really non-notable. -- Magioladitis 13:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NN, no references showing coverage in secondary sources, fails WP:BIO. --Kudret abi^Talk 04:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.