Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill's Moustache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 16:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bill's Moustache

The only reference I can find for this drink is this article. Hoax or nonsense Gretnagod 13:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. 16 Ghits only for "Bill's Moustache". Not notable.--Jusjih 13:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense, nn. --Terence Ong 13:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unreferenced, does not seem notable, and is probably a hoax. PJM 13:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Save. It's not a hoax, I've heard of it (in real life, I live in Melbourne); but it may not be considered notable enough (at least on the internet) to warrent it's keeping --Cradle 14:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

If you're unsure about its notability, then why do you feel obligated to save it? Can you provide any sources? PJM 14:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Or even the phone number of a pub or bar where it is available? Gretnagod 14:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: There's a cookbook on one of the wikiprojects, isn't there? I know that verifiable cocktail recipes usually end up transwikied somewhere... -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 17:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Osbus 21:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Sounds like an interesting idea, but doesn't seem to exist.
• Comment: I've had one. It might also be known as a different name, I dont know. It's an interesting drink, you should try one. And it really does smell burnt. Up to you but I dont see why people should be denied the chance to read it and try one.

(NOTE to above: please sign your posts with ~~~~ B.Wind 14:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Wait 7 days for references. If they are supplied, keep it; otherwise, delete. B.Wind 14:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Save They're quite good Ploink 03:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.