Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilitruim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. howcheng {chat} 20:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bilitruim moved to Bilitrium

Zero google entries on this word. Seems it is original research Mecanismo | Talk 10:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Josh Parris#: 12:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, rename and expand. This is one of the numerous articles we have on Star Trek materials. [1]. -- JJay 22:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment. I have moved this to its correct name, which does produce google results. - Pureblade | ^Θ 02:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot, we have a category for star trek materials. -- JJay 02:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Can you prove notability on this though? Which series, what episode, to what effect, that sort of thing. Unless you can expand, it seems Delete-worthy to me (and I'm a Trekkie). Marblespire 04:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• I'm a fan of classic ST, this is from DS9. [2]. -- JJay 04:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• (Oh right, link. Clever me. u_u) One episode? Trellium-D I could countenance, but THIS... ~Mbsp

• Yeah, Trellium-D is good stuff, but Bilitrium is probably more powerful when the antimatter converter is used properly. -- JJay 08:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.