Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Momma's House 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Big Momma's House 3

Big Momma's House 3 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article's existence is not yet warranted per the notability guidelines for films. If the project enters production, the article can be recreated. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 08:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per the notability guidelines for films and possibly WP:CRYSTAL due to the lack of verifiable content about this upcoming film. There doesn't even appear to be a listing at IMDb, and this does not appear to qualify as a reliable source that fails to have a reputation for fact-checking or editorial oversight. If the project can be evidenced to enter production, then it would be appropriate to recreate the article. However, there appears to be nothing to salvage here. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This appears to be WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable. If this project can be evidenced to enter production, then the article can be recreated. However, right now, it appears to be a hoax. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - I wouldn't call it a hoax, but imdb has no record of the film making me wonder whether it will actually go ahead. The one link that is shown, provides minimal evidence to suggest this article may be true, or even for that matter, verifiable. But if it is a hoax, why has it took from February to now to put here? Rudget _{Contributions} 15:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• It's not hard to fathom. Lots of articles simply aren't noticed until one has a glance at a category listing (as occurred in this case, I believe). Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 15:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• I would have to say that such a sequel was probably talked about -- the same thing happened with Ghost Rider 2, in which the producer said that they'd make a sequel during press for the film. It doesn't mean that time and money will realistically be invested in such a project. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and my deep depression in the fact that there was a Big Momma's House 2. :/ JuJube 22:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete no real verification that such a movie is being made. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as per all of the above. Greg Jones II 23:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.