Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Hazard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Big Hazard

Hmmm...let's see. It's an unreferenced article that's been on cleanup since Sept.2005 without additions. It tells us nothing other than that the subject is as old as the author can comprehend (ie: about 70 years) and that other unrelated elements of the subject may have provided source material for a movie. Delete unless this provokes an interesting and comprehensive rewrite. Eddie.willers 03:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, lacking interest. Royboycrashfan 03:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable gang, possible hoax. Rory096 03:14, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 04:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn gang Ruby 04:36, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. VegaDark 12:37, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 04:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 01:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.