Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. W.marsh 23:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Big Crash

Article is original research by someone who wants to propose an alternative to the Big Bang. --ScienceApologist 21:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete with prejudice, as nominator. --ScienceApologist 22:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. We already have Big Crunch, but it's probably not worth a redirect. Tevildo 21:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak KeepRedirect to ekpyrotic. Apparently it's real and has gotten some notice[1]. Yanksox ^(talk) 21:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, in that case we should redirect this article to the Ekpyrotic model since that is what the reporter for the Dallas Morning News was writing about. I have yet to meet someone who studies the ekpyrotic model speak of it as the "Big Crash" though (and technically, it still is a Big Bang model). I'm still going to leave this AfD up, though, because I'm not sure that this synonym is notable enough to warrant a redirect keep. It may be that the reporter who wrote the article referenced was just being clever. --ScienceApologist 21:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.