Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Chocolate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Kirill Lokshin 01:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Big chocolate

Original research/neologism. ERcheck 03:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. ERcheck 03:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

*Delete I don't doubt that Big Chocolate does exist, but their influence is negligible, certainly low enough below the bar for notability on Wikipedia. -Greg Asche (talk) 04:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, per GregAsche and nominator. Superm401 | Talk 04:20, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - funny, but not notable. BD2412 T 05:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
    • Vote changed to keep, per Uncle G's scrupulous documentation. BD2412 T 15:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Research reveals that this isn't original research, and that it is fairly widely held view that there is a group of multinational chocolate companies known as "Big Chocolate". Although there is some overlap between this and ground that we already cover in chocolate and slavery, there is also ground here that is not covered in that latter article. Keep. Uncle G 14:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep article. Additionally, I will annouce here that I am suggesting a merge of chocolate and slavery into this article. Jacqui ★ 06:10, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Uncle G. Influential in chocolate-growing regions and apparently in EU trade politics. FreplySpang (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. A well-documented article. -Willmcw 20:46, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per User:Uncle G. - Dalbury (talk) 00:08, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
  • keep please because of what uncle g said Yuckfoo 01:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
  • keep the article: part of current affairs and widely published about in the media and do not merge with chocolate and slavery: that article deals with a entirely different issue. V8rik 15:36, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.