Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother 9 (US)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Big Brother 9 (US)

Big Brother 9 (US) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I dbed it, but it was removed. It was then proded, so I decided to put it here. Thanks, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 03:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Still too early for this article. I also removed the PROD, since AfD was started. - Rjd0060 05:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. WP:CRYSTAL, also quite promotional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Jak (talk • contribs) 08:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. It is purely WP:CRYSTAL. Qworty 09:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Need I mention WP:CRYSTAL? •97198 talk 09:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 02:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete without prejudice to future creation, as strike version could be a regular or celebrity version, but we don't know for sure yet. Nate 07:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Too early for this. Just because there are reports that CBS may air a winter edition doesn't mean that we need an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alucard 16 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but rewrite and remove the list of casting calls. The fact the series has been officially announced by the network removes it from crystal ball contention, and establishes sufficient notability for it to have an article. Plus there has been media coverage (CNN being one) regarding the new season being fast-tracked because of the strike. However the casting call list has to go. It should also be checked to make sure that previous seasons have been treated in this way. If they haven't, then merge with the main article. 23skidoo 21:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment The winter edition is speculated due to the strike. Sources close to the matter reported to Variety the possibility of Big Brother in the winter. There hasn't been anything official from CBS to confirm Big Brother's return. Also guidelines of WP:BIGBRO state that until there are promos on television the article shouldn't be created beforehand. All pages that are created before promos or just a few months away from an announced edition are deleted until it is very close to the season's launch. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete without prejudice - at the moemnt it reads liike an advert. Restore when the show actully airs.--Lucy-marie 16:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete Way too early, I havn't been able to find anything to support this except for a fan website. I think the only way this page should stay is that someone should come up with some links to prove that the show has at least been confirmed. Seth71 20:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep Falls into the same class as Survivor 16, which also has an article. The only thing speculative about this is when it will appear, not whether it will appear. --SilverhandTalk 16:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete. What's the date of the airing and recording of it, just to be curious? Critical info missing, obviously which it makes an automatic WP:CRYSTAL failure.JForget 00:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Suggestion I was just thinking lets keep the page for now. I have re-written the article to have key information such as info released from CBS about casting and when it airs. And that it won't be a Celebrity edition. I know a bunch of us say delete, but lets keep this page up for a while so we won't have to go through people recreating the page and us wanting it deleted until needed. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 05:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.