Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biffole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Biffole

Biffole (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) –

Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, neologisms, or dictionary entries. Pick one. shoy 03:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NFT. Not encyclopedic. meshach 05:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete AIMspeak that hasn't even made its way to Urbandictionary.com yet. Chubbles 05:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:N and WP:V, no sources are cited at all. meshach 05:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Sorry about that. meshach 05:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment you !voted twice Chubbles 05:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment: The interesting part is her two different "votes" were for different things. - Rjd0060 14:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The second "vote" was meant for a different debate. I just got my tabs mixed up in firefox and didn't take the time to make sure I was on the right one. meshach 16:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Ahhh.. I see. - Rjd0060 17:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Per above (NOT, NEO, DICT). - Rjd0060 14:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete To copy Rjd0060: Per above (NOT, NEO, DICT). Pig^man 17:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.