Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical feasts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --- Glen 05:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Biblical feasts
Essay/sermon. WP:NOT for essays. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as original research--TBCTaLk?!? 06:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - OR. (I have moved the article to a more sensible title. -- RHaworth 06:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. VegaDark 08:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Essay, no encyclopaedic content (yeah, I hate that argument, but in this case it's true), original research/commentary. — NMChico24
09:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC) - Delete as original research. Thε Halo Θ 11:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, this (or something very similar) has previously been deleted as FEASTS OF THE LORD (AfD discussion). Lankiveil 11:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC).
- Comment Good eye - Is there an admin that take a peek at the previously deleted article? If it's the same as this article, then this one is speediable. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's close. I don't speak for other administrators but for me it isn't quite close enough. Although the two articles have the same strong bias towards a particular religion, and both cover the same set of topics, the text is not identical. The deleted article addresses the reader several times via the first person plural whereas this one does not, for example. This article mentions Judaism whereas the deleted article does not, for another example.
Both are clear attempts at a mis-use of Wikipedia for publishing sermons, contrary to our Wikipedia is not a soapbox policy, however. Uncle G 17:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, we'll let the AfD run its course. Thanks for checking! --AbsolutDan (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's close. I don't speak for other administrators but for me it isn't quite close enough. Although the two articles have the same strong bias towards a particular religion, and both cover the same set of topics, the text is not identical. The deleted article addresses the reader several times via the first person plural whereas this one does not, for example. This article mentions Judaism whereas the deleted article does not, for another example.
- Comment Good eye - Is there an admin that take a peek at the previously deleted article? If it's the same as this article, then this one is speediable. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Dennisthe2 16:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per TBC. —Khoikhoi 21:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Why is the AfD page called "How to sumit article"? Confusing Manifestation 01:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete preachy ReverendG 02:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
