Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhartiyavidya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result waskeep, nomination withdrawn. Ifnord 00:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bhartiyavidya
I tagged this as an ad before, which may have been a little harsh, but it does read somewhat like a press release. It is a teaching system of some sort, which I concede may possibly be notable, but its notability would need to be cited. Delete unless cited and cleaned up. Grandmasterka 02:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Keep now that I reformed the article into a clean stub. It seems notable enough to me and has been featured in secondary sources. Grandmasterka 21:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I have not heard of this teaching system in India atleast by way of news or gossip. Seems like a new system unheard by the general public. if it gains some recognition, then undelete it.--Ageo020 02:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment something related to this has been dropped at the bottom of ICT (education), might warrant some looking into. --W.marsh 03:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1.I will include the website www.bhartiyavidya.com to indicate the existence of the concept. 2.To indicate recognition i will include results of surveys from thousands of students and teachers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vandanaahuja (talk • contribs) .
Have made the changes..will wait for your response —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vandanaahuja (talk • contribs) .
- Keep lets give Vandanaahuja a chance. We can always bring this up a month from now. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Can i remove the notices on the article now, till it comes up for review again? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vandanaahuja (talk • contribs) .
- Delete per nom. SynergeticMaggot 07:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: you've got 5 days to clean it up if you want it kept. In which case I'll change my vote so long as its all WP:V. SynergeticMaggot 07:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Grandmaster Ka...i agree my attempts have probably not been good enough....i have deleted all other attempts which either aimed at supplementing any other article or were posted in any other category. My aim is not to vandalise any article on wikipedia or advertise this concept. But, the fact that the concept had found widespread appreciation in a developing country like India which still faces numerous challenges for the implementation of Information Communication Technologies in Education is worth a look. Also this endeavour has been on for 5 years now. So i thought maybe it was worth a mention on Wikipedia....maybe, you could give me one last chance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.7.67.88 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete unless rewritten to resemble something other than an ad. As it stands now, this article is little more than spam. Resolute 03:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. The editor seems eager to get the article into shape - I see no reason to outright delete it. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Since most of my article has been already deleted, can the notice on top regarding deletion be removed?--Vandanaahuja 07:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.