Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakti Vaibhava Puri Goswami
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus - Keep Article can be stubified until sources are found ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bhakti Vaibhava Puri Goswami
Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Delete Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep for now, until I can do a little more research into it. He does in fact appear to be notable, but I've not yet had a chance to do external research on him. TallNapoleon (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep needs a little more research. Sgt. bender (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I am open to any information you come across in your attempts to research this subject. I haven't been able to find anything, but would appreciate it if you could find some information, references, etc. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 05:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Its virtually impossible to find any information on the above, mainly due to numbers of leaders who have a name Puri Goswami and due to the fact that his name will be rearly spelled this way. Wikidās ॐ 09:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources indicates to me that the article fails to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 21:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
