Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyton Middle School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to Beyton --JForget 23:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Beyton Middle School
Non notable middle school. If not a deletion perhaps a merge into Beyton? Paste (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Beyton per established precedent. Mergers do not require an AfD and this need not have come here. TerriersFan (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't disagree with Merge/redirect to Beyton as suggested by TerriersFan but to imply that I am wasting time by bringing this to AfD is harsh. Wikipedia even has a category 'Middle schools in England' so by no means are all redirected or merged! Paste (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Beyton. I agree that the "mergers do not require an AfD" comment is probably unnecessary and definitely inaccurate. I would discourage anyone from taking it upon themselves to do a merger and a transformation of a person's article into a redirect. Paste's action is more preferable than the "be obnoxiously bold" approach. Mandsford (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I would discourage anyone from bringing merge proposals to AfD. If you're not feeling BOLD, put a merge tag on it, discuss it on the talk page, or bring it to Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect as usual. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as per TerriersFan. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to the appropriate school district/town as outline in WP:SCHOOL. This primary school is not notable enough to warrant an article on its own. Wisdom89 (T / C) 22:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as per Wisdom89. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as per everyone else. (jarbarf) (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.