Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Markup Language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomanganitalk 14:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Better Markup Language

Of the 100-odd unique Googles, none appear to be reliable sources. If this is a significant enterprise I have yet to see any evidence of it. I don't see much evidence of it replacing PERL, PHP or ASP, which is its intended purpose. Guy 08:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak delete no verified assertion of notability. Destined to be a permanent stub. Cain Mosni 01:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Yomanganitalk 11:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article doesn't establish notability, and Google searches don't help. The one thing the article does specifically detail is that this open source software intended for free use is still mostly used only by its creator Danga software. That appears a real world marker of its failure to become established.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not Freshmeat. Notability not shown, the text is not very informative. There are quite few template languages, typically used by creator only. Pavel Vozenilek 13:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete Notable as a rather visible component of LiveJournal (ever wondered why most pages there end with .bml?), but I guess this has not really caught on elsewhere. Yet another Perl+HTML deal. Probably does no harm if it's deleted now and, if notability materialises, is recreated. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.