Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betka Schpitz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing in article or sources (mostly blogs and myspace) to suggest there is anything notable about this individual. WjBscribe 21:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Betka Schpitz

Betka Schpitz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not established or sourced per WP:BIO. RJASE1 Talk 00:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: Several mentions or articles in a number large or even small circulation magazines, as well as a popular topical blog might meet WP:BIO. I was limited to what I could look at while I'm at school, but I'm not very confident that this AfD nomination should be granted. (No claim of bad faith by the nom. implied whatsoever). Scienter 17:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not enough to prove notability. Realkyhick 01:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources to back up notability claims. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, says the inclusionist, knowing no one cares. I have added a link to a review of her blog on DirtySpoke.com, which argues for notability. I'm inclined to keep pages like this where there's some sense of a larger media awareness of the figure (rather than merely an ignored vanity site). The exposure from her blog, the modeling, & her formation of Just Suck It Already.com add up to a notable subcultural figure. She's odd, she's offensive, she's covered elsewhere (she's googlable, she has myspace to hype her), & she's still in our bailiwick. I'd much rather have stubs on people like this than more pages on individual TV episodes. Ventifax 04:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.