Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best read blind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Best read blind

Best read blind (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

notability Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez 23:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Merge to the main article as it would more appropriate there with some trimming too.--JForget 23:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable university group, plus bizarrely placed discussion of a TV show. Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There's very little context in this article, which makes it a bit hard to judge, but research suggests it would fail notability even if it were expanded. There's very little out there about it, and what there is still doesn't tell who they are or why they're encyclopedic. --Moonriddengirl 11:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• 'Delete per nom, Moonriddengirl and Eliz81. I'm not sure if WP:HOLE] applies to groups, but if it does, it applies here. Even after reading the article, I can not figure out what is notable about it.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.