Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Pals Forever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Best Pals Forever

Best Pals Forever (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was erroneously tagged as an A1, doesn't qualify for speedy. While amusing, it breaks my inclusionist heart - this is just wrong. No value whatsoever, at best a misplaced BFF (best friends forever, which probably should be an article, but is a South Park episode currently), at worst an amusing page. Hey, the Mr. T and Boy George photo made me chuckle... badlydrawnjeff talk 22:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete ... or possible transwiki to Uncyclopedia? JavaTenor 22:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as vandalism/attack page. Contains unattributed libel. Leuko 22:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Uh, libel? --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
    • "attack page"?? Croxley 02:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Reluctant Delete but this would make a fine addition to uncylopedia or encylopedia dramatica. --Xyzzyplugh 22:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - it's as funny as hell. What about WP:BJAODN? - Richard Cavell 23:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - be a shame to lose it completely though - WP:BJAODN or Uncyclopedia as mentioned above? EliminatorJR ^Talk 23:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Reluctant delete a fine piece of comedy writing. Croxley 02:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Sadly, Delete - but not to take this to WP:BJAODN would be a crime. Grutness...wha? 03:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Rhobite 03:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I really think it's a speedy - it is nonsense. (Honestly, read the first sentence.) Yes, please move it to BJAODN, since there's been a lot of effort put into it, it's very nice-looking and quite well-written. But there is no question that it has to be deleted.--Bonadea 08:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.