Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berwick Bandits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 06:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Berwick Bandits

• Article was created in November 2005, has had no edits (other than mine) since then. Is sloppily written and seems to be mostly of a commercial nature. DeleteTheRingess 00:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 17:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn sporting club. Harro5 00:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems ok. -- JJay 02:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This article makes no sense. YixilTesiphon ^{Say hello}_{Be shallow} 04:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep if Wiki-fied. Established English speedway club --Simon Cursitor 08:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean-up. Seems notable enough for a speedway club -- fan-sites and all that... -- Marcika 13:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Tom Harrison ^(talk) 14:47, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• delete as nn. Sorry.Gator (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Given their near-forty-year history, they get my "ten years from now" nod. Denni ☯ 03:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep and {{cleanup-rewrite}} to remove POV. Stifle 10:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as meeting notability requirement. Turnstep 23:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.