Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertazzoni-Italia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. No indication that this is advertising but the claim for notability is debatable and more information would be helpful in improving the article. Sam Blacketer (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bertazzoni-Italia

Bertazzoni-Italia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete was tagged speedy, declined, re-tagged and I declined because some folks here think anything 100 years old merits note. I'll write my great grandmother's article next year I guess :-) but really folks, it's just a business with no indication why it's notable and longevity of 100 years in an Italian business isn't overly old. Carlossuarez46 04:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. I originally tagged speedy G11. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: I wouldn't really call it "blatant advertising", but after a lack of references present in the article, and via a google search, it does not appear to be notable. - Rjd0060 04:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The nomination provides no real reason to delete. The article makes claims of notability ("distributed in 60 countries") and provides a source. Here's another. Colonel Warden 08:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 06:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 06:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 08:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Colonel Warden. (The history section of the company’s website is not entirely devoid of interest.) —Ian Spackman 09:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails notability per WP:CORP#Primary_criterion. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Multiple independent sources, and others can be found on google. Satisfies definition of notability, and is an old if relatively obscure manufacturer or popular consumer products with worldwide distribution. This is dead center in the range of subjects Wikipedia should cover if it is going to discuss consumer products. Company's longevity adds, does not detract, from notability. No cogent reason has been offered for deletion.Wikidemo (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.