Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkheimer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy to User:Berkheimerjj. Royboycrashfan 00:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Berkheimer

nn, more suitable as Userpage. Google scores 0 for Jeremy_Berkheimer, Jeremy_John_Berkheimer and for "A manifestation of Calenture and Conciousness" Kevin McE 08:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - Per this page and an Amazon review. If kept, page should be moved to Jeremy Berkheimer. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 10:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment 109 people have submitted reviews of that DVD: does that make them all published writers who merit an entry? The photolog is part of a community that has 100 members by the name of "Smith", and so guarantees no outstanding acheivement. Photography and film reviews are not his claim to fame: there seems to be no record on the internet of his "best known work" Kevin McE 11:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
      • Delete - You make a good point! Kilo-Lima|(talk) 19:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or userfy if you feel like it. Very much non-notable; the links that Kilo points out above are a set of pictures on Webshots and a review on Amazon.com. This search returns 9 unduplicated hits, none of which comes close to verifying anything claimed in the article. This, his "best known" work, returns no Ghits. --Deville (Talk) 14:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 16:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Dekete per above. Henning Makholm 20:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete; I do not see how sumbitting a review or some photos on the Web makes one person notable. - Liberatore(T) 17:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Blink484 22:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.