Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkeley Groks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proto::type 13:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Berkeley Groks

Berkeley_Groks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete Adds nothing to Wikipedia as this page gives no information about the show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theichibun (talk • contribs) 13:38, 21 November 2006

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • KeepNotable podcast and radio program on stations across the country. 65,000 Google hits. Guests include leaders in all branches of science. Edison 21:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    • If this is such a notable thing, then why the short article that tells me basically nothing about it?Theichibun 12:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete has no information. Also, I fail to see notability. It's a podcast. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 18:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • KeepNotable radio program. It is syndicated on radio stations across the country and in Australia. Notable guests include Nobel Prize scientists and authors.
  • Keep This IS a notable radio show. Of course, I'm biased, since I produce the show. ;) I didn't start this wikipedia entry for my program, which suggests that there are several people who believe that the show IS notable and worth posting in the wikipedia. I've been reluctant to expand on the brief article by the original posters. But, since the main criticism seems to be that there is a lack of information in the article, I have expanded it to include more information. Tigerchuck 00:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete/merge the necessities into KALX. It would be notable if it were "the first to", but it's only "among the first to". ~ trialsanderrors 08:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.