Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benowa State Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already merged by Euryalus and redirect to district to attribute original authors. --Oxymoron⁸³ 10:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Benowa State Primary School

Benowa State Primary School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

As with most primary schools, I have doubts that this one is notable. I can't find any such assertions. [1] — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete Appears non-notable. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

• Merge to Benowa, Queensland which is not a large article Mandsford (talk) 03:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete does not assert notability. Oysterguitarist 04:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Euryalus (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per Mandsford above. Not notable on its own. Lankiveil (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC).
• Merge for notability reasons. The article is unsourced, makes no assertion of notability and its subject has not been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent sources. Euryalus (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - in anticipation of a merge outcome, I have gone ahead and merged the relevant material into Benowa, Queensland as suggested by Mandsford. If the outcome is not merge, it won't hurt to have this material in two places. Euryalus (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete The information is contained in the suburb article per WP:LOCAL. So the page may simply be deleted as not meeting notability. Twenty Years 16:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect - no logical reason to delete rather than redirect. TerriersFan (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I'd normally say merge, but in this case there is nothing to merge as what is needed is already there (see Twenty Years's comment). Orderinchaos 08:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to district. CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Few schools are notable (in my opinion), and this isn't one of them. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.