Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Rongey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. gren グレン 23:41, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ben Rongey
Unverifiable... the few results for "Ben Rongey" are just results of high school athletic events. The article seems to be a joke/hoax of some sort. --W.marsh 23:53, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - non-notable biography. Also block 70.156.107.40 for repeated vandalization of this AfD. --Aurochs
- Delete as unverifiable at best. --Metropolitan90 02:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - seeing exactly 0 verification on Google makes me doubt notability (as well as veracity) - Andre Engels 09:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- I was leaning towards delete before, but that previous anon message has convinced me. delete. Grutness...wha? 23:49, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - as noted.--Bookandcoffee(Leave msg.) 05:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppet votes
- Keep BEN RONGEY works outside of your internet, sorry if "googling" him didn't work. Try harder, dig deeper. It's the BEN RONGEY way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.149.7 (talk • contribs)
- Keep It's a shame that real art goes unnoticed and scoffed at in these rather troubled times, but I was comforted when I noticed Ben Rongey's name on this site. The city of Winnipeg owes so much to that amazing young man. I ask you to work hard into completeing his fragmented article in order to bring BEN RONGEY to us all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.156.107.40 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.