Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Manski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arkyan • (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Manski

Ben Manski (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Non-notable. Not sourced. Delete GreenJoe 16:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - Notable Green party activist. Has appeared in numerous very notable publications and news outlets. The nom is AfDing, prodding or speedy tagging a majority of Green Party member articles. Could be a bad faith nom. --Oakshade 16:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
    • WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. I just saw a lot of non-notable entries in the cat. --GreenJoe 16:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Co-chair in a notable third party easily deserves article. Davewild 21:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
    • There are 7 co-chairs, so that argument doesn't hold water. GreenJoe 21:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. the only "source" is a local paper's interview of the guy about John Kerry; so if I get asked by some reporter about George W. Bush, I'm notable; Yahoo!; under WP:BIO several unrelated articles about the person in question is what's required. This falls waaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyy short. nn. Carlossuarez46 21:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • He was interviewed as a political authority, not as a man on the street as would be the case if you were interviewed. The title even starts with "Green Leader." --Oakshade 00:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability established above. I will assume good faith but apparent 'agenda noms' show a lack of judgement.--killing sparrows (chirp!) 05:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • KeepDon't see reason for deletion, but i do see pattern that looks like 'agenda noms'T L Miles 16:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.