Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Himowitz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:22, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ben_Himowitz
Obvious vanity.—Trevor Caira 00:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. James F. (talk) 00:34, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously. — mark ✎ 00:45, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. vanity. Nateji77 01:00, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Userfy if at all possible. I have developed the following theory on vanity pages: they're mostly people who are (a) getting their feet wet in Wikipedia, (b) don't know the criteria for notability, and (c) would be just as happy being able to present the information posted here on a user-page, if they were offered that opportunity before having their contribution chewed up and spat out in the vfd process. -- BDAbramson thimk 01:53, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
- Original page was by an IP user, not a logged-in user. I don't think it's appropriate to userfy to an IP, though I generally agree with you about vanity pages created by logged-in users. (Delete this.) android↔talk 02:00, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed (hence the qualification, "if at all possible"). I'd go so far as to suggest we make a vanity page template that advises the poster that they have the option of making this a user page, and gives them a few days to get to it before we vfd the page. -- BDAbramson thimk 02:23, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
- Original page was by an IP user, not a logged-in user. I don't think it's appropriate to userfy to an IP, though I generally agree with you about vanity pages created by logged-in users. (Delete this.) android↔talk 02:00, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. LouisRivera 02:54, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, if you want to create such a template, by all means do so, but they have five days to Userfy the article if they want, we don't need to keep vanity articles lying around just hoping somebody does something with them. RickK 04:24, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. PedanticallySpeaking 16:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, as noted. Linuxbeak | Desk 18:02, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:11, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
- I liked BD2412's template idea, so I was bold and created one and put it on the page. (Template:PotentialVanity) --Arcadian 14:44, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
