Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Avraham Nhamani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete deletion log shows that this article has been deleted before and per WP:SNOW this is closed as delete.--Jersey Devil 15:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Avraham Nhamani

Ben Avraham Nhamani (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. The weird spelling of the name got my attention. I live near Jerusalem, and i go to galleries, and i've never heard The only cited source is the "artist"'s website. The spelling of his name on the website is also badly inconsistent, which is a red of "the painter of Jerusalem". Google doesn't find any good primary source. I also tried googling "בן אברהם נחמני" in Hebrew and found some forum posts and an archived page of the Hebrew Wikipedia's Community Portal, which says that the article about him was deleted. light - the whole website looks like it came from some marketing website mill and part of it is actually written in Lorem ipsum. Also, "the painting on display in Vatican" is not necessarily on display - the website only shows a letter from the Vatican in which they thank the gallery for sending the picture to them. To put it short - it's a stab at advertising. Amir E. Aharoni 13:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete yet another obscure person using WP for free self-promotion. Totnesmartin 13:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources. -- Whpq 14:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not appear to be in multiple non-trivial references that is independent of the artist itself. Spellcast 14:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Google only comes up with sites selling his paintings, and the like. No independent reviews, critisism, etc, of his work. Probably meets WP:CSD A7. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This subject does not appear to be notable, as well as clearly failing the verifiability policy. — Rlest 15:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.