Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bells (Blackadder)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bells (Blackadder)
This is a non-notable episode that fails WP:N by not having real world information as described in WP:EPISODE and WP:WAF. TTN (talk) 18:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep now has a "real world" ref (I actually have that tape somewhere too). If that's not enough, then just redirect it to List of Blackadder episodes. Lugnuts (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Lugnuts; if it fails Wikipedia:Television episodes it should be merged not deleted. Tim! (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: It seems extraordinary that a TV episode's notability hinges on being given away free with packs of tea.--Nydas(Talk) 12:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know it sounds far fetched (but true), but I did go and find a real world reference to it, source it and add it to the article. Unless you can do something better to improve the article? No, I guess it's easier to criticise. Worst case is that it gets redirected. Lugnuts (talk) 12:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, oh yeah, I've got that somewhere as well. It's the one where Baldrick introduces the tape and asks if he should redo it "with a little more sexual charisma". I'd say that this is quite a famous episode of the series. Bob talk 15:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable episode of very popular and well known sitcom. I'm sure more real world information can be found.--UpDown (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It is unbeliveable that some on nominate only one episode of Blackadder for delete but no other episode of the show/series and Blackadder has many spoof point at history so I would keep for that matter to. The Tramp 00:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Probably because the nominator is a jobsworth and is clutching at straws. Lugnuts (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I've added a real world ref from the Official Hansard of the Australian House of Representatives. RMHED (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.