Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belifan

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:07, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Belifan

This really looks to me like a hoax, I have never heard of this word and couldn't find it on an online dictionary or google search. In any case, it's pure dicdef with no potential redirect or merge, so delete.--Dmcdevit 23:10, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC); amend: found on anglo-saxon dictionary, not that that changes anything. --Dmcdevit 23:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Even if it is an actual word, as you say, it's clearly dicdef, and there really doesn't seem to be anywhere where it would comfortably fit. – Seancdaug 23:51, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a dicdef. Mo0[talk] 06:16, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• transwiki wikt and del dicdef —msh210 17:30, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  Forgot to say, I already transwiki-ed it. Check out the talk page. --Dmcdevit 23:08, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• delete, since it has been transwikied Dsmdgold 19:48, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.