Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beija-Flor Jeans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beija-Flor Jeans

Beija-Flor Jeans (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable clothing manufacturer. A Google test for "'Beija-Flor Jeans' -wikipedia" yields 227 results, which include two hits for their home page and a number of directory listings. These are reflected in the sources listed in the article. The sun article is about "jeans parties," mentioning Beija Flor in passing. The next three are directory listings from different sources, the fifth is an internal press release. The sixth is a directory listing. The only other claim to notability mentioned in the article is their sparking the "jeans party" movement. A Google test for "jeans party" fails to demonstrate that such a thing even exists, let alone that this company was responsible for setting them lose on the world. Consequentially 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete A glance at the article history shows that this article passed through Wikipedia:Articles for creation, probably because the reviewer was impressed by the variety of sources. As the nom points out, the sources don't amount to much, and the conflict of interest is hard to escape. Shalom Hello 01:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - I'm the AFC passer; I believed its significance was in the 'innovative' jeans party, but I don't vouch for its inclusion. ALTON .ıl 03:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The links on that page are trivial mentions + directory info. Delete unless somebody can find RS Corpx 05:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Too few good sources, unfortunately. Adrian M. H. 23:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral it would be nice to see some more references. --PEAR (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.