Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begodden Mists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Although the creator cannot (and does not) demand deletion, he can participate like anyone else can, in the same way as for a more usual 'keep'. Stifle's observation seems quite well rebutted by PJM, and although not policy, WP:MUSIC does ask for two albums, so those who cite it do have grounds. We touch two-thirds here, and that's enough in this case (especially noting the "if" in Kappa's comment). -Splashtalk 00:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Begodden Mists

Fails notability test in WP:MUSIC. --Whouk (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy deleteper A7. Delete. Expanded away from speedy status, but they still don't meet WP:NMG. PJM 12:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as non-notable musical group. No allmusic entry. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 12:38Z
  • Keep if verifiable evidence of coverage in the British media can be added. Kappa 15:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. They have four albums out. Stifle 02:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
It appears that these albums are self-made; I believe they're unsigned. [1]. PJM 04:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I created the page and having read the notability guidelines i agree the page should be deleted. My apologies. (As far as i'm aware at least one of their releases was on Black Custard Records, but they're now defunct, the others were self-released.) WP:NMG. Erstwerst 16:59, 7 January 2006 (GMT)
    • Comment The above message was posted by 85.210.160.130. While it may have been Erstwerst, the user was not logged in. --Whouk (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Apologies not quite sure how that happened, i thought i was logged in! --Erstwerst 13:24 9 January 2006 (GMT)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.