Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beggar's Oil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, no strong, policy based, reason for deletion given, consensus says keep. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Beggar's Oil
non-notable album of an otherwise notable musician - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Does the same apply to other albums by this artist, or is this just a particularly unsuccessful one? In general I prefer to have separate articles for either all or none of a band's albums - removing this particular article while leaving the others in the chronology intact would be a little unproductive, in my opinion. ~ mazca talk 17:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- The release in question was an EP. The music was created at the same time as the previous recording in the chronology. I agree that having the whole chronology is important. User:Airproofing talk
- Weak keep Even if it's an EP, it was on a major label and by a notable band; those factors are usually enough to warrant a decent article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep because it's a major release by a major artist; my second choice would be to merge it to Sky Like a Broken Clock, it's companion album.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep reviews of this album are linked. If you are unfamiliar with a subject, consider adding a tag to request citations rather than calling for deletion. -MrFizyx (talk) 06:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.