Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beersaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Beersaw

Beersaw (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Yet another completely non-notable drinking game...Wikipedia is not for things thought up in your dorm one day. UsaSatsui (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

All right, I can see where you're all coming from... bummed out but I guess we just need to get coverage somewhere else out there and then after that try re-posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belovett (talk • contribs) 02:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

• delete as non-notable game. Looks kinda fun though! I've dropped a note on the main editor's talk pages about the AFD. StephenBuxton (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, original research, entirely unsourced. Tan | 39 14:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• 'Delete per no original reasearch. BigDunc^Talk 15:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment from page author - This isn't simply a non-notable drinking game isolated to one dorm room. It's a new, inventive game which has three verified locations in different areas of the US (photographic proof still trying to be uploaded), with at least three more under construction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hidingfromgodot (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Because this game is played in three locations does not make it notable per Wikipedia policy. This article is entirely your original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. If this game has been covered in multiple reliable, third-party sources - major newspapers, magazines, television reports - then perhaps it is appropriate for Wikipedia inclusion. However, my research on Google shows no coverage whatsoever. Popularity at your particular institution does not merit inclusion on its own. This comment was also left on the talk page of the article. Tan | 39 16:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, this article is non-notable, unreferenced junk. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 01:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, unreferenced, non-notable. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, made up game. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 22:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Pile-on "delete" for all the reasons given above. --Craw-daddy | T | 23:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.