Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beeramid (old)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:34, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Beeramid

Un-notable neologism, no links, ho hum. Eliot 22:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, cleanup, add pictures. 5,000+ Google hits shows that this is no neologism. Numerous references to both the architectural feat and the drinking game. -- BD2412 ^talk 01:20, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Agreed, keep. I've seen some impressive structures of this type. This is a coined word, but a significant one. --L33tminion (talk) 03:08, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete trivial & not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 03:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. 22,600 results from Google when I searched for "beeramid" tonight. These structures are very common and well-known. Though it may be on the encyclopedic/Wiktionary edge, it appears to be notable/non-trivial, and non-neologic. Some external links were added the same day it was nominated. I admit, this was my first article; though it was the lack of an article for such a well-known phenomenom that actually moved me enough to stop using Wikipedia as a reference tool alone (as I had been for the last 3 years) and start making contibutions. DurtyWilly 05:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Article seems reasonably well written, but still appears on Orphaned pages. Josh Parris ✉ 03:20, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.