Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer pong variations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Doc^g 00:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beer pong variations

Beer pong variations (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Adequately covered at Beer pong, WP:NOT a game/howto guide. Seraphimblade 04:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete this article after a merge of any "important" items with Beer pong. Nashville Monkey 04:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. This information originally was in the Beer pong article, but was moved to a separate article after a discussion on the talk page. I agree that this article reaches no significant intellectual heights (and needs some grammatical cleanup as well) but Beer pong, believe it or not, is listed as a good article. The information in this article is (probably) relevant but would make the main article too long -- some (like myself) would argue that it is too long the way it is. If anything, the material on variations in the original article should be merged into this article. Seventypercent 05:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a game guide, also this list is difficult to maintain and attracts non-notable newly invented variants, likely to fail WP:NFT. JIP | Talk 06:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notable and referenced variations can be covered on the main page. These are neither. This cruft was correctly removed from the main article to make it better. It should not be moved back en masse. Being removed does not make it deserving of its own article.Obina 19:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, reference, and cleanup As Obina said, this page was created to get rid of the many unreferenced and probably non-notable versions of this game from the main beer pong page. If we can find references for some of the ones on here, then it's worth keeping. That's a big IF however. --AW 20:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Obina. Edison 20:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This says it all: "This page was created to get rid of the many unreferenced and probably non-notable versions of this game from the main page." If anything, this could be userfied until someone can determine if any of the items are worthwhile; at that point, those items can be merged back into the main page. This article is useless.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 06:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom... Addhoc 23:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom ::mikmt 00:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.