Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beepjeep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd^(?!?) 04:16, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Beepjeep

Apparently not a neologism, this word "stems back to ancient roman times, referring to a 'Lord BeepJepaniar' who ruled the land of BoopJooria." The problem is that this is quite unverifiable, where and when was BoopJooria? Hoax, unverifiable, not a common term anyway. Borders onto patent nonsense. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:13, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Can't we speedy it for being patently untrue? Average Earthman 12:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  • It has been pointed out to me that sometimes apparently insane comments from from a work of fiction, warranting inclusion. However, since this one states it comes from the mind of someone who's article has been deleted twice (and was created by the same person as this page), this would not appear to be the case. Average Earthman 19:01, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kappa 05:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "Untrue," sadly, is not a CSD. This is one is really a disguised A7, however. Chick Bowen 22:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.