Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beekeeper Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Singularity 02:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beekeeper Records

Beekeeper Records (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable record label. All of ONE album has been released on the label, and there's pretty much no independent coverage. One of the co-founders is apparently a writer at Pitchfork Media, but I think we'd agree that it's not enough to justify notability. fuzzy510 06:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. I've always thought we should have an article detailing how financial records are kept by beekeepers. But, uh, this ain't it. Qworty 10:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete ...f**k 'em, they're only bees. I mean it fails to establish any notability, so it should probably buzz off. Sorry, I'll behive myself. Lugnuts 17:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  • With all of the bee puns in there, I'm shocked that you didn't say that it lacked any nota-bee-lity.....--fuzzy510 18:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
    • There's always a sting in the tail! Thanks for pointing that out, Buzzybee510. Lugnuts 07:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Marxy, their only signed band, per WP:MUSIC criterion 6. I know they're not an ensemble as such, but these guidelines can be adapted. - Zeibura ^(Talk) 23:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.