Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becca Haines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I know, I'm closing and I'm the nominator. This debate has already attracted more attention than it needed, let's move on to more productive things. Mangojuice^talk 18:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Becca Haines

Becca Haines (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Local-level actress, with no sources attesting to any further notability. Contested PROD. Delete. Mangojuice^talk 03:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:N. Deor 03:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Um, it sounds like she is, like, 14 or so. That is a little young for some repertory theater roles and some local ballets to lead to notability. Out. --Brianyoumans 03:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Vanity, not notable. --Sable232 04:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy A7 may be appropriate, very clear lack of notability. Apparently an autobiography (I wonder if she goes to the "Cambridge Freinds School"(sic)?. — Krimpet (talk/review) 05:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete "At the age of three, she was a yellow taxi for halloween". Must have been some good acid, but three years old seems a little young to be taking it? Croxley 06:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this really is self promo an the bit about fun facts????? do we really want to know this? Delete an she can sob to her friends--Zedco 10:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Scienter 14:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per A7, no assertion of notability. There are zero relevant hits under Google [1], ; this is just another kid doing local children's theater. RGTraynor 16:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • "Professional actress" = assertion, in my book. But yeah, clearly delete. Mangojuice^talk 17:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
    • All that means is that she claims to have gotten paid for it. I'm a "professional paralegal," come to that, by the same standards, but that doesn't mean I just asserted notability, quite aside from that there are damned few "amateur" ones. RGTraynor 17:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Seattle Skier (talk) 21:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - does not seem notable enough for me. Andy Saunders 21:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Any article with a "Fun Facts" section has me looking for the proverbial gong. Non-notable. Realkyhick 21:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Just 28 Ghits even before before checking whether they are for this person. --Groggy Dice T | C 14:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.