Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty Addict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 05:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Beauty Addict

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• Keep no copyright violations, image has been removed. Amybethrichman

• Keep image has been removed. site is nearing top 100,000 and success is part of a growing cyber beauty trend. don't see why it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia that has a cosmetics section??? Carriejennings

nn website, image is probably a copyvio too. 109,969 Alexa ranking. Rory096_(block) 22:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• delete per nom. Bucketsofg 22:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sulfur 22:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn website and ads. *drew 06:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong, almost Conan-like, delete. Per above, with additional Sheesh. Does this belong in an encyclopedia? Colonel Tom 13:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.