Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Angle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus--JForget 23:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beautiful Angle

Beautiful Angle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was prodded with reason "importance of subject not established". The talk page of the article has an argument for keeping. I feel it's best to decide here. I have no opinion at this time. CitiCat ^♫ 03:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 04:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: the usual reasons for deletion are not relevant here: verifiability, for instance, is clearly established. However, no encyclopedic content has yet been posted. Without such, I cannot judge the appropriateness of this article; in short, the authors have given me no reason to think this project has any importance at all. If such is added, I would keep; if not, I would delete; but until I get some data, or indication of apathy, I can't vote either way. Alba 04:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep based on Alba Elmao 10:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now. It is really quite hard to judge whether it should be deleted or not. If it doesn't improve, it can be renominated at a later date.Darkcraft 11:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I made an effort when it was first created back in April to find notable content and encourage others who were editing it to do so but none was forth coming, I've tried again since and still haven't turned any up. The posters they print are beautiful, but their activities as a guerrilla arts group do not appear to have received any significant commentary. There is nothing encyclopedic beyond providing a listing that we can say about them. They fail our general notability guidelines and Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- SiobhanHansa 11:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per SiobhanHansa. Indrian 17:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Apparently notable in Tacoma., sourced verifiabilty.--Victor falk 21:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep oddly enough this seems notable... as far as guerrilla arts poster projects go. Burntsauce 21:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.