Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeatPick (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus is it fails WP:WEB - Yomanganitalk 23:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BeatPick (2nd Nomination)

spammy/advert for website, alexa rating of 768,744, possibly WP is not crystal ball Giant onehead 00:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment Previous AfD discussion. --Wafulz 02:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Per lack of consensus to delete after it was earlier restored after being deleted with weak consensus. See the previous AfD if you are confuzzled by this. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 08:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet WP:WEB.--Peta 04:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:SOAP, WP:WEB, little (endogamic) verifiability, etc. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. -- Kicking222 00:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete advertising. Resolute 04:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep dont understand why you do not like this beatpick thing. there are many other small record label on wikipedia and most of them are much less worth to be noted. this beatpick guys are doing something OK and truly innovating. many articles can be found on the net. DJMag, creative commons, openbusiness, dogmanet + a number of people have blogged them. they have over 100 artists. it's a new way of doing business in the music industry and should be on wikipedia. i've never written before for wikipedia and I am one of their artists... so..not an impartial opinion but still there are a few facts about beatpick that cannot be said to be untrue. I think you should research better the subject before branding the article as "pure advertising". btw I noticed that last 2 "delete" comes from people that have given very little contribution to wikipedia. take care of yourself. Mark Johanson.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.