Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Edgar181. Whispering 11:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beark

Beark (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I believe this article is a hoax, I have searched for anything about it to no avail. Gorkymalorki 06:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, of course it's a hoax, how could a bear and a shark possibly produce offspring together? Nyttend 06:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment No, a bear and shark having offspring makes more sense, the article said that the bear got his legs bitten off by the shark, then he beat up the shark and surgically put the sharks fins on himself.Gorkymalorki 06:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • We shouldn't even give it the privilege of being called a hoax, its outright patent nonsense, Speedy Delete G1 Rackabello 07:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • SPEEDY DELETE STRONG DELETE AND SALT THE EARTH: How fast can we get an admin over here? -- VegitaU 07:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The deletion request was vandalised by an anon put it back.Delete and Protect against recreation.Harlowraman 07:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- I think this qualifies as a rationale: "Eventually the bear won the fight and the fins of the shark were taken and surgically reattached to the bear to make it a super bear or Beark.". --Haemo 07:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Had to put the Deletion request up two more times, same anon keeps taking it off. Gorkymalorki 08:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment IP editor has been warned with {{uw-3rr}} and {{uw-afd2}}. If it happens again go to {{uw-afd3}} and {{uw-afd4}} if necessary, but he's over 3RR anyway so reporting it at WP:ANI/3RR can now happen if he does it again. --Dhartung | Talk 10:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.