Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 13:38, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Bco
This site has an Alexa ranking of 127,378, which isn't as bad as it could be, but the site still doesn't seem that important. If the article is kept, somebody needs to edit out all of the junk (I tried, but I don't have the patience). Delete. Joel7687 07:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Full of rubbish too. DarthVader 10:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep.
-
- Above vote by Simonmi2. User's first edit (Contribs)
- Delete nn, website advertising. JamesBurns 06:59, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. BCO is a rich and active community where people can find a wealth of travel, music, art, fashion information. The article apparently keeps being edited by it's users thus reducing it's usefulness. Imeyer 17:47, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- User's first edit. (Contribs)
- Delete. Non-notable. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 08:33, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Votes made by anon
- Delete. I wanted to shoot myself in the face with a shotgun when I read this article.
-
- Above vote by 170.140.210.108
- Delete. blam.gif
-
- Above vote by 207.245.36.114
- Keep.
-
- Above vote by 24.198.1.103.
- Delete. blam.gif...seriously.
-
- Above vote by 63.203.254.174
- Delete. as a BCO member, I find this entry useless. Thanks.
-
- Above vote by 213.238.215.91
- Keep. As a long-lasting and seminal messageboard BCO deserves to have an entry.
-
- Above vote by 80.45.197.203
- Keep. BCO is a messageboard unique on the internet... (mostly) unmoderated and (mostly) intelligent and (always) entertaining and as such deserves to be noticed and defined. 20:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.114.155 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 2 August 2005
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.