Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay of Plenty Electricity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus = keep (5/6). 16:28, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bay of Plenty Electricity

Contributor of this one line article is furthering an agenda at expense otherwise non-notable subject FRS 23:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom--FRS 23:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom--Medude24 23:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep One of 7 electricity companies in NZ according to the template, all of which should have articles. It is marked pov, which is the appropriate response. Deletion is not. CalJW 23:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. Of the six other electric companies, three have neutral content; the other three have conclusory agnda-furthering one liners: i.e.,

"XXX is the third cleanest electricity retailer in NZ because it generates 100% of its electricity from renewables but it didn't answer questions from Greenpeace NZ,"

"According to Greenpeace, [YYY] is the least environmentally friendly electricity retailer in NZ because its ... parent company is planning to build a coal powered generator," and

"ZZZ is the second cleanest electricity retailer in NZ because it generates 100% of its electricity from renewables but hasn't ruled out burning fossil fuels in the future"

that should be deleted imo--FRS 23:37, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete this one and the other three until someone writes a decent article. -- Kjkolb 00:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Olorin28 00:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. It seems to meet WP:CORP in having verifiable third party sources but is substub at the moment. Would vote to keep a decent stub on this article. Capitalistroadster
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.
• Keep: I've done the obvious and removed the POV rubbbish, replacing it with a neutral statement and a stub tag. As far as I can tell this is a keeper per WP:CORP. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 10:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Just zis Guy's rewrite. Well done to him for rewriting it. Capitalistroadster 17:19, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as rewritten. --A D Monroe III 20:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. --Cactus.man ✍ 08:46, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notability is not part of deletion criteria, this subject is verifiable. Trollderella 19:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.