Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay.NET

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bay.NET

Delete as a non-notable website. Article looks like an advert, smells like an advert, feels like an advert. Isopropyl 13:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this article looks like a good candidate for deletion. We aren't given a reason to care about the group, other than as advertising copy. It's potentially a speedy delete as an article about a group which doesn't assert notability, but there is arguably such an assertion there, and that's not why you argued for deletion anyway. By the way, I note that your speedy argument was better than your AfD argument. You haven't mentioned WP:WEB here, or indeed done anything to distinguish your nomination from a vote. Nominations make the case for deletion, as strongly or weakly as the nominator is able, and generally should not include votes (that's just letting the side down!). fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn website, ad. --Terence Ong 15:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it Innovation requires collaboration. Many US corporations have cut training budgets to nearly nothing. To gain skills people need to learn. Bay.NET like INETA and SDForum provide education for about free. I feel that is notable and worth an entry on wikipedia. --erpguru 01:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 04:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Stifle 16:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advert and fails WP:WEB --Wingsandsword 04:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.