Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield Live

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As said, '"new and growing sport" automatically implies a lack of notability.' —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battlefield Live

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Ad, no evidence of notability. Delete --Peta 04:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete reads like an ad. Should actually be speedied with no assertion of notability. A shame, its well written though. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Lack of references is bothering me, otherwise I'd be more inclined to think this could be a part of Wikipedia.UberCryxic 04:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if references can be provided, otherwise delete. Nick 04:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

* i say keep it. It is a good summary of a growing sport. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.217.186.171 (talk • contribs)

• I'm the author of the article, considering Battlefield Live is a new and growing sport, I am unable to give references that aren't primarily about the equipment and perks of the sport, which, if I linked or provided, could be misconstrued as advertising, I'm able to give references from the actual company who originally created the game system, but again, it could be considered advertising or generally biased, please advise me how to proceed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SanjuroDP (talk • contribs)
• I've added the references section to this article in hopes of saving it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SanjuroDP (talk • contribs)
• Comment "new and growing sport" automatically implies a lack of notability. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Added new 2 new references, one of which to counter "Notability" debate, will also add external links soon linking various official Television and News coverage on Battlefield Live in hopes of ending the question of prominance on Battlefield Live.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.