Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield 1918

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 00:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battlefield 1918

  • Delete - Unnotable mod. Should be deleted unless solid evidence of notability is provided. --nlitement [talk] 23:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 16:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination; all but the most exceptional game mods are non-notable. — Adrian Lamo ·· 21:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nom is violating WP:Point, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/True_Combat:_Elite. That said, Delete --Mmx1 23:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination Jedi6 00:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep BF1918 is far from beeing unnotable. It's one of the biggest Mods for Battlefield 1942. W++ 14:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Yep, BF1918 is a very large mod for BF1942. Sorry, but you're wrong on this one.⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 14:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment : This nomination was made as part of a WP:POINT. Nlitement is upset over his article being nominated for AfD as unnotable, so he is nominating several other mods as AfD in retaliation. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 14:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, definitely notable. I never played it myself, but I do play Forgotten Hope and the BF1918 seems to be the second most popular out there. Halibutt 21:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Very notable. Ive never played it either, but from what I hear this is a very popular mod second only to Pirates and Forgotten Hope. The Raven 02:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per the keep voters who seem to know what they are talking about. Kappa 12:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.