Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the River Plate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Blatantly bad-faith nomination. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 06:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Battle of the River Plate

Battle of the River Plate (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Not too big a battle. Only double digit casualties (clearly not much). I don't think it's worthy of an article. User:WaWa12 5:43 AM UTC

• Speedy Keep. Do I need to say anything? Obvious frivolous/bad faith nomination. Tevildo 05:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Probably the biggest single naval battle in New Zealand military history, and a decisive part of the war of the South Atlantic.. Grutness...wha? 06:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep and revert to previous version with an infobox. Clear bad faith nomination. --Dennisthe2 06:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - Important battle, resulting in a motion picture being made about it. JRHorse 06:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Obvious Keep. I know we're supposed to assume good faith, but this is stretching it.--OinkOink 06:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.